There
is a school of thought at the moment that as part of the fight
against drugs, every single employee should be drug tested at their
place of work. This proposition seems to have gained at least some
popular support, although as far as I can tell no politician is
pushing for this yet. Leaving aside any possible breach of human
rights and invasion of privacy, which is not to be taken lightly,
this seems to me to be an ill-considered proposal which would have
deeply damaging social implications.
Of
course, the idea is that employees who take drugs will reconsider
doing so, due to the possibility of loosing their job through being
tested positive at work. This may well be the case for some
occasional drug takers, but what happens to those, for example, who
are regular cannabis smokers and who are not willing to forgo one of
their pleasures? Estimates of adult cannabis usage in the UK put the
figures anywhere between 6% - 9% of the population. Even if we take a
very conservative estimate, that's well over 3 million cannabis users
of working age. That's potentially 3 million people, many of whom are
good and productive workers, now unemployed and claiming benefits. And
the perverse thing is that takers of harder drugs, such as ecstasy
and cocaine, have a better chance of keeping their jobs as their
drugs of choice take a much shorter period of time to work their way
out of the body.
What
a scandal this would lead to if passed in law. Employers would loose
many of their best workers, those who lost their job would find it
extremely difficult to find new employment, and the drain on our
already very tight public funds would be immense. I'm not condoning
anyone going into work under the influence of any drug, including
alcohol, but as long as an employee is doing their job to a
satisfactory level, is it really of any concern to the employer what
they do outside of work?
No comments:
Post a Comment